Friday, October 10, 2014

Small Scale CFSPP Load Flow Analysis

In this study, a graphical single-line diagram (SLD) was constructed to represent the electrical network of a small-scale Coal-Fired Steam Power Plant (CFSPP). The diagram integrates both overhead and underground cable systems, allowing comprehensive modeling of the entire distribution network.

The analysis scope included:
  • Load Flow Calculation – Determining active and reactive power distribution across the system, identifying voltage drops, and assessing network efficiency.
  • Short-Circuit Analysis – Evaluating fault currents for various fault scenarios to ensure protective devices operate within safe limits.
  • Motor Starting Studies – Assessing voltage dips and system stability during large motor energization.
  • Transient Stability Simulation – Examining system response under dynamic disturbances.
  • Protective Device Coordination – Verifying settings to ensure selective and reliable fault clearance.
  • Cable Derating Assessment – Applying temperature, grouping, and installation condition corrections to cable ampacity.

All circuit element properties—including transformers, circuit breakers, cables, and loads—were directly editable from the single-line diagram or underground raceway interface. This streamlined design allowed real-time calculation results to be displayed on the diagram itself, providing immediate visual feedback for engineering decisions.

Interpretation of Load Flow Results

The single-line diagram reflects real-time electrical parameters at each major node in the system, allowing direct insight into the operational performance:

  1. High Voltage Bus (HV Bus)70 kV, 1600 A, 31.5 kA
    • Acts as the main distribution backbone for the plant.
    • Load flow shows 99.7% efficiency, meaning voltage drop is minimal.
    • Reactive power compensation is visible with kvar values near zero balance.
  2. Step-Up Transformer (7.2 kV → 70 kV)
    • Responsible for transmitting generator output to the HV grid.
    • Load at secondary side: ~9940 kW, 6160 kvar.
    • Transformer loading is within safe operating range.
  3. Generation Unit12 MW nominal capacity
    • Actual load recorded: ~11310 kW (≈94% of nominal).
    • Reactive power demand: 7998 kvar, managed by system capacitors.
    • Generator operates at ~99.9% voltage regulation, indicating stable excitation control.
  4. Auxiliary Transformer (UAT) 1121 kVA
    • Supplies plant auxiliary loads (lighting, pumps, control systems).
    • Efficiency ~99.8%, minimal losses.
  5. Bus and Feeder Segments
    • Each segment annotated with MVA, MW, and Mvar readings, plus efficiency %.
    • Any percentage <98% would be a red flag for excessive voltage drop or line loss.
    • In this case, all readings are ≥99.7%, meaning system is well-balanced.
Key Findings
  • The system is optimally designed for its load profile, with high efficiency across all buses.
  • Reactive power flow is well-managed; kvar values are within compensable limits, reducing the risk of low power factor penalties.
  • Cable loading and bus voltages confirm that no part of the network is overstressed.
  • The single-line diagram doubles as a live dashboard—both a documentation and monitoring tool.